The reconciliations with the appropriate GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release issued yesterday afternoon. So I'm just wondering, does others', I guess, lack of capital discipline cause you to think about changing your plans, given you all are a low-cost operator? I think that's something that would have been unheard of six or seven years ago as investors pushed us to generate more free cash over cash flow. We are focused on generating free cash flow per share, growing free cash flow per share over growing cash flow into a tenuous macro environment.
And instead of focusing on single well returns, we're really focused on what the return is per section and per DSU. Kaes, maybe you can talk about you guys talked about fourth quarter guidance and that sort of $925 million CapEx for 4Q as you kind of get back into more of a maintenance mode. As you move into more of the Endeavor acquired acreage in 2026, should we anticipate any significant changes to those three graphs? Or can you talk to your confidence levels around well productivity as you kind of start harvesting and putting together these plans around some of the acquired pieces?
We've been able to generate more free cash this year, 15% more per share, despite oil prices being down 14%. Circling back on the macro, I mean, everyone's gotten more capital efficient this downturn. Can you just talk about how less capital efficient it is to grow versus stay in maintenance as we saw in 2022? And I think we feel like the Diamondback development style is differential and really optimizes the return for every DSU and every dollar that we're investing there.