What is fiduciary duty?
A fiduciary duty is the legal obligation of someone entrusted with another party's interests to act for that party's benefit rather than their own. In a company, directors and officers owe fiduciary duties to the corporation and, ultimately, to its shareholders. It is the standard against which board conduct in a transaction is judged.
The duty is conventionally split into two strands. The duty of care requires directors to be informed and to deliberate with reasonable diligence before deciding. The duty of loyalty requires them to put the company's interests ahead of their own and to avoid conflicts and self-dealing. A third strand, the duty of good faith, is often treated as part of loyalty.
In M&A, fiduciary duty is not abstract — it dictates how a board runs a sale process, how it handles conflicts, and what protections (special committees, fairness opinions, market checks) it must put in place to withstand later challenge by shareholders.
How fiduciary duty shapes a deal
A board's fiduciary obligations drive the procedural choreography of a transaction. The recurring moves are:
- Run an informed process. To satisfy the duty of care, the board must gather adequate information — financials, advice from bankers and counsel, and often a fairness opinion — before approving a deal.
- Manage conflicts. Where a director or controlling shareholder has an interest on both sides, the board insulates the decision, typically by forming a special committee of independent directors to negotiate.
- Test the market. Depending on the situation, the board may need to canvass alternatives or conduct a go-shop or market check to show it sought the best reasonably available outcome.
- Document the record. Minutes, advisor presentations, and committee deliberations build the evidentiary record that the board acted carefully and loyally.
Doing this well shifts a court's review toward the deferential business judgment rule; doing it poorly invites the far more demanding entire fairness standard.
Business judgment rule versus entire fairness
Courts do not second-guess every board decision. Under the business judgment rule, a court presumes that an informed, disinterested, good-faith decision was made in the company's best interests, and will not disturb it. This is the standard most well-run boards aim to earn.
When the board is conflicted — for example, a controlling shareholder on both sides of a deal — the presumption flips and courts may apply entire fairness, requiring the defendants to prove both a fair process and a fair price. Procedural protections like an independent special committee and an informed minority vote can shift the analysis back toward business judgment, which is precisely why those protections are built into conflicted deals.